NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs AMD FirePro M6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and AMD FirePro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 3150x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 32 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3749 vs 1820
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28928 vs 8095
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 3024
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1832
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 3024
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1832
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 1 July 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3749 vs 1820 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28928 vs 8095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 vs 3024 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 vs 3024 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 1832 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6000
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 307
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 vs 307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD FirePro M6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3749 | 1820 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 776 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28928 | 8095 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 3024 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 3024 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD FirePro M6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Heathrow |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 1 July 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 536 | 538 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 43 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |