NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce MX450

NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
2.1x more core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 667 MHz
2x more boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 771 MHz
681.1x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 148.0 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
Around 66% higher memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28928 vs 19225
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 5946
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 5946

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 Aug 2020 vs 22 July 2014
Core clock speed	1395 MHz vs 667 MHz
Boost clock speed	1575 MHz vs 771 MHz
Texture fill rate	100.8 GTexel/s vs 148.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 150 Watt
Memory clock speed	10002 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	28928 vs 19225
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6326 vs 5946
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3710 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6326 vs 5946
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3710 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5200

2.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 896
4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6120 vs 3754
Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 554 vs 306
Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1278.433 vs 849.116

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2304 vs 896
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6120 vs 3754
PassMark - G2D Mark	554 vs 306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1278.433 vs 849.116

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3754

6120

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

306

554

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

28928

19225

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

849.116

1278.433

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6326

5946

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3710

3708

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6326

5946

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3710

3708

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3353

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	NVIDIA Quadro K5200
PassMark - G3D Mark	3754	6120
PassMark - G2D Mark	306	554
Geekbench - OpenCL	28928	19225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	849.116	1278.433
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6326	5946
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3710	3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6326	5946
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3710	3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		47.147
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		50.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		115.307

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Code name	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	GK110B
Launch date	1 Aug 2020	22 July 2014
Place in performance rating	536	538
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$1,699.74
Price now		$523.66
Value for money (0-100)		14.51
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1575 MHz	771 MHz
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	667 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	896	2304
Texture fill rate	100.8 GTexel/s	148.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	7,080 million
Floating-point performance		3,553 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	64.03 GB/s	192.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	10002 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5, GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
GPU Boost
Optimus