NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and AMD Radeon Pro 560X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1004 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 97% higher memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3733 vs 3678
- Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29232 vs 17527
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 849.116 vs 679.583
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 5367
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2495
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 5367
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2495
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 16 July 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1004 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3733 vs 3678 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29232 vs 17527 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 vs 679.583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 vs 5367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 vs 5367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 896
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 303
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 896 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 vs 303 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3733 | 3678 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 711 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29232 | 17527 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 679.583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 5367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 5367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2088 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Polaris 21 |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 16 July 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 550 | 551 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1004 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX450 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4850
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560X
