NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and AMD Radeon Pro 560X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1004 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 97% higher memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3745 vs 3678
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28942 vs 17541
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 849.116 vs 679.583
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 5367
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2495
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 5367
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2495
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 16 July 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1004 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3745 vs 3678 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28942 vs 17541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 vs 679.583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 vs 5367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 vs 5367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 896
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 305
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 896 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 vs 305 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3745 | 3678 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 | 711 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28942 | 17541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 679.583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 5367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 5367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2106 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Polaris 21 |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 16 July 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 549 | 546 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1004 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX450 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAGRID K260Q
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2200M
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560X
