NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 2322.6x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3745 vs 3465
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28942 vs 12495
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 849.116 vs 757.295
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 5157
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 5157
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3745 vs 3465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28942 vs 12495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 vs 757.295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 vs 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 vs 5157 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 305
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 3710
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3354
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 3710
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3354
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 vs 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3745 | 3465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 | 312 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28942 | 12495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 757.295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 5834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 7859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 5834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 7859 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2106 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.772 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.567 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GM107 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 549 | 550 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,870 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |