NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 99% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2114 vs 1061
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 22 February 2019 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 vs 1061 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1575 MHz
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 10002 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12900 vs 3750
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 307
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61100 vs 28933
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 vs 849.116
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 6326
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 6326
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1575 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 10002 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 vs 3750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 vs 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61100 vs 28933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 vs 849.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | 12900 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 807 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 61100 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 2573.643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | 1061 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | TU116 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 22 February 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 524 | 221 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Price now | $279.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |