NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce MX450

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
2.1x more core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 657 MHz
2.4x more boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 657 MHz
2397.1x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 42.05 GTexel / s
Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
5x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 2000 MHz
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3750 vs 1714
Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 231
5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28933 vs 5605
Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 849.116 vs 509.958
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 2836
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2728
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3333
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 2836
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2728
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3333

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 Aug 2020 vs 30 May 2013
Core clock speed	1395 MHz vs 657 MHz
Boost clock speed	1575 MHz vs 657 MHz
Texture fill rate	100.8 GTexel/s vs 42.05 GTexel / s
Pipelines	896 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 55 Watt
Memory clock speed	10002 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3750 vs 1714
PassMark - G2D Mark	307 vs 231
Geekbench - OpenCL	28933 vs 5605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	849.116 vs 509.958
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6326 vs 2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3710 vs 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6326 vs 2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3710 vs 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3750

1714

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

307

231

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

28933

5605

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

849.116

509.958

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6326

2836

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3710

2728

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6326

2836

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3710

2728

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3333

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
PassMark - G3D Mark	3750	1714
PassMark - G2D Mark	307	231
Geekbench - OpenCL	28933	5605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	849.116	509.958
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6326	2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3710	2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6326	2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3710	2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2114	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		15.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		30.422
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		53.992

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Code name	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	GK106
Launch date	1 Aug 2020	30 May 2013
Place in performance rating	524	1114
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1575 MHz	657 MHz
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	657 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	896	768
Texture fill rate	100.8 GTexel/s	42.05 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	2,540 million
CUDA cores		768
Floating-point performance		1,009 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size		large
SLI options		1
API support
DirectX	12.1	12 API
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	64.03 GB/s	64.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	10002 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5, GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
GPU Boost
Optimus
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
TXAA