NVIDIA GeForce MX450 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1395 MHz versus 657 MHz
- 2.4x plus de vitesse augmenté: 1575 MHz versus 657 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 100.8 GTexel/s versus 42.05 GTexel / s
- Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 896 versus 768
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10002 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3750 versus 1714
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 versus 231
- 5.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 28933 versus 5605
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 849.116 versus 509.958
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 versus 2836
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 2728
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 versus 3333
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 versus 2836
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 2728
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 versus 3333
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 Aug 2020 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz versus 657 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1575 MHz versus 657 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 100.8 GTexel/s versus 42.05 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 versus 768 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10002 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 versus 1714 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 versus 231 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 versus 5605 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 versus 509.958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 versus 2836 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 2728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 versus 2836 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 2728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 3333 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | 1714 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 231 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 5605 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 509.958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 2836 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 2728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 2836 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 2728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.673 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.512 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.992 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Nom de code | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 1 Aug 2020 | 30 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 524 | 1114 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1575 MHz | 657 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | 657 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 100.8 GTexel/s | 42.05 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,009 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.03 GB/s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10002 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX450 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon R7 340 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
