NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1127 MHz
• Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1178 MHz
• 1400x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 72 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 1428.9x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28933 vs 18734
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 849.116 vs 792.44
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3335
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3335
• 13x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2114 vs 162

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

• Around 14% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 896
• Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6111 vs 3750
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 307
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 vs 6326
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 vs 6326

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3750 6111
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	307 673
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	28933 18734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	849.116 792.44
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6326 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6326 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2114 162

Compare specifications (specs)