NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- 572.7x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 1428.9x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 60% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2114 vs 1321
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 2 June 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 vs 1321 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- 3.1x more pipelines: 2816 vs 896
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13758 vs 3750
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 vs 307
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42988 vs 28933
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.98 vs 849.116
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 vs 6326
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 vs 6326
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 896 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13758 vs 3750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 852 vs 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42988 vs 28933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 vs 849.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 vs 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 vs 6326 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | 13758 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 852 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 42988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 1722.98 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | 1321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GM200 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 2 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 524 | 310 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Price now | $679.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 2816 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 176 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 8,000 million |
CUDA cores | 2816 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |