NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 2.3x more pipelines: 896 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 66% higher memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3750 vs 2392
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 240
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28933 vs 9329
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 849.116 vs 535.24
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 4027
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 4027
- 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2114 vs 888
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 21 February 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 937 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 vs 2392 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 vs 240 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 vs 9329 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 vs 535.24 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 vs 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 vs 4027 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 vs 888 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | 2392 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 240 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 9329 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 535.24 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | 888 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GP108B |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 21 February 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 524 | 861 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX450 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon R7 340 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
