NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1245 MHz vs 1085 MHz
1835.9x more texture fill rate: 79.68 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 60 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
350x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7753 vs 3901
3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43499 vs 11526
2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 274 vs 117

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 Dec 2021 vs 18 February 2014
Boost clock speed	1245 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Texture fill rate	79.68 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2048 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 60 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7753 vs 3901
Geekbench - OpenCL	43499 vs 11526
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	274 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 735 MHz
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 480

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1020 MHz vs 735 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	521 vs 480

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

480

521

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7753

3901

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

43499

11526

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

274

117

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark	480	521
PassMark - G3D Mark	7753	3901
Geekbench - OpenCL	43499	11526
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	274	117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3329

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell
Code name	GA107	GM107
Launch date	17 Dec 2021	18 February 2014
Place in performance rating	348	707
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Price now		$299.01
Type		Desktop
Value for money (0-100)		15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1245 MHz	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	735 MHz	1020 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	159.4 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	10.20 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.100 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2048	640
Pixel fill rate	39.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	79.68 GTexel/s	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	60 Watt
CUDA cores		640
Floating-point performance		1,389 gflops
Transistor count		1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	35 mm, 1.4 inches	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	229 mm, 9 inches	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	113 mm, 4.4 inches
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA