NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14152 vs 12844
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70788 vs 64683
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.337 vs 174.714
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.852 vs 17.305
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 13848
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3680
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3336
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 13848
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3680
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3336
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2019 vs 10 July 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14152 vs 12844 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70788 vs 64683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 vs 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 vs 17.305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- 2.1x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1920
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 750
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 3131.344
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 135.923
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 1141.283
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 1920 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 vs 750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 vs 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 vs 1141.283 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14152 | 12844 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 769 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70788 | 64683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 | 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 | 3924.968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 | 17.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 1226.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7487 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU106 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 7 January 2019 | 10 July 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | $1,599 |
Place in performance rating | 150 | 194 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | 4096 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s |