NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 versus AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 44% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 7.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14152 versus 12529
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 versus 745
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 70826 versus 64683
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.337 versus 174.714
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.852 versus 17.305
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 13848
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3680
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3336
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 13848
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3680
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3336
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 versus 10 July 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14152 versus 12529 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 versus 745 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70826 versus 64683 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 versus 174.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 versus 17.305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 4096 versus 1920
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 versus 3131.344
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 versus 135.923
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 versus 1141.283
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 1920 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 versus 3131.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 versus 135.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 versus 1141.283 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14152 | 12529 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 745 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70826 | 64683 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 | 174.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 | 3924.968 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 | 17.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 | 175.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 1226.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7486 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | TU106 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 | 10 July 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | $1,599 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 151 | 196 |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 4096 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 12,500 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 384.0 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
NVIDIATITAN V
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon 760M
