NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 60x more pipelines: 1920 vs 32
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 80 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- 8.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 113.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 vs 124
- 13.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 vs 57
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 1701
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 1701
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2019 vs 1 June 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1920 vs 32 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 vs 124 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 vs 57 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 1701 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
- 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 160 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 | 124 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 | 57 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 1701 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Tesla |
| Code name | TU106 | G84 |
| Launch date | 7 January 2019 | 1 June 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Place in performance rating | 161 | 1564 |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 32 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | 289 million |
| Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||

