NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11344 vs 11124
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 820 vs 767
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16895 vs 13044
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8909 vs 7164
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16895 vs 13044
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8909 vs 7164
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 29 January 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt vs 230 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 11344 vs 11124
PassMark - G2D Mark 820 vs 767
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16895 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8909 vs 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16895 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8909 vs 7164

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 885 MHz
  • Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1185 MHz
  • 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 186736 vs 77603
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 8059
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 8059
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 885 MHz
Boost clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1185 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 186736 vs 77603
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 8059
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 8059

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
11344
11124
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
820
767
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
77603
186736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16895
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8909
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8059
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16895
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8909
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8059
30936
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark 11344 11124
PassMark - G2D Mark 820 767
Geekbench - OpenCL 77603 186736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16895 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8909 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8059 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16895 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8909 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8059 30936
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU106 Vega 10
Launch date 29 January 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 20 6
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1185 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 885 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 10,800 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6