NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 230 Watt
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78123 vs 69812
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.794 vs 16.925
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 13044
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 7164
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 13044
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 7164

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

• Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 885 MHz
• Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1185 MHz
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13932 vs 11748
• Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 483
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 171.616 vs 168.08
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 vs 1935.102
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 111.023
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1195.863 vs 1001.496
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 8055
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 8055

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11748 13932
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	483 815
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	78123 69812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	168.08 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1935.102 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.794 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.023 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1001.496 1195.863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17328 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8912 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8055 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17328 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8912 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8055 30936

Compare specifications (specs)