NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 818 vs 796
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11434 vs 10925
  • Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 204079 vs 186736
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16734 vs 13044
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16734 vs 13044
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8908 vs 7164
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8908 vs 7164
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 29 January 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt vs 230 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 818 vs 796
PassMark - G3D Mark 11434 vs 10925
Geekbench - OpenCL 204079 vs 186736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16734 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16734 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8908 vs 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8908 vs 7164

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 885 MHz
  • Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1185 MHz
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 8047
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 8047
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 885 MHz
Boost clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1185 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 8047
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 8047

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
818
796
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
11434
10925
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
204079
186736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16734
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16734
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8908
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8908
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8047
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8047
30936
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark 818 796
PassMark - G3D Mark 11434 10925
Geekbench - OpenCL 204079 186736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16734 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16734 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8908 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8908 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8047 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8047 30936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU106 Vega 10
Launch date 29 January 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 12 7
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1185 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 885 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 10,800 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6