NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 23% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 11408 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75589 vs 65520
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 16138
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3714
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3355
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 16138
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3714
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3355
- 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6789 vs 2345
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 4 November 2017 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 11408 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75589 vs 65520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 vs 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 vs 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6789 vs 2345 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 296.223 vs 168.08
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 vs 1935.102
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 vs 22.794
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 vs 111.023
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 vs 1001.496
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1405 MHz vs 885 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2304 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 296.223 vs 168.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 vs 1935.102 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 vs 22.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 vs 111.023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 vs 1001.496 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11546 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 469 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75589 | 65520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | 296.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | 4303.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | 23.759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | 163.551 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | 1382.954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6789 | 2345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU106 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 4 November 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 175 | 213 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 885 MHz | 1405 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3840 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 379.7 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 11408 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 547.6 GB / s | |
