NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
- 3.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7393 vs 2340
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 602 vs 323
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12357 vs 5918
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18604 vs 8496
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18604 vs 8496
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3687
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3687
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3336
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3336
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 1 February 2017 |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 7008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7393 vs 2340 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 602 vs 323 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12357 vs 5918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 115 Watt
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7393 | 2340 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 602 | 323 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12357 | 5918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 | 3336 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU106 | GP106B |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 1 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 121 | 533 |
Price now | $489.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 768 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |