NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1410 MHz
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1620 MHz
• Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18198 vs 16112
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 819
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98281 vs 88096
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 vs 251.703
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 vs 3742.063
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 vs 27.153
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 vs 153.341
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 vs 1304.365
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 22615
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 22615

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

• Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 215 Watt
• 224.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1569 vs 7

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18198 16112
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	879 819
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	98281 88096
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	293.508 251.703
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4045.784 3742.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.145 27.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	158.103 153.341
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1438.826 1304.365
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25232 22615
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25232 22615
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	7 1569

Compare specifications (specs)