NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1620 MHz
- Environ 11% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2304
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18252 versus 16173
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 versus 824
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 99912 versus 87137
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 versus 252.062
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 versus 3729.447
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 versus 27.133
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 versus 154.621
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 versus 1303.435
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 22615
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 22615
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 17 October 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1620 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 2304 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18252 versus 16173 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 versus 824 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 versus 87137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 versus 252.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 versus 3729.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 versus 27.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 versus 154.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 versus 1303.435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 215 Watt
- 1267.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8871 versus 7
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 215 Watt |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8871 versus 7 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18252 | 16173 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 824 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 | 87137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 252.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 3729.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 27.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 154.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1303.435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 8871 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU104 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 17 October 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 133 | 140 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 229 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
