NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 280 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 3707
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 vs 3353
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 3707
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 18 December 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 280 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Around 84% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 57% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 2944
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 13147
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 536
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 81953
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 19139
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 19139
- Around 90% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 15164 vs 7990
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 2944 |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 vs 13147 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 vs 536 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 81953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 19139 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 vs 7990 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13147 | 19986 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 536 | 827 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 81953 | 138072 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 25820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 25820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7990 | 15164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104B | TU102 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 18 December 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 143 | 90 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1095 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | 4608 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 280 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |