NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 13044
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 13044
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 13 August 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 13044 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3652
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3652
- 533.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 58
- 533.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10795 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 30936 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 30936 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 203 | 118 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $999 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AppleA14 Bionic
