NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1530 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19220 vs 13840
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 915 vs 770
• Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109119 vs 68161
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 355.748 vs 171.616
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4352.008 vs 4031.404
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.57 vs 16.925
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1654.321 vs 1195.863
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27846 vs 13044
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27846 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 193.772
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3709
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3352
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3709
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19220 13840
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	915 770
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	109119 68161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	355.748 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4352.008 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.57 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	193.772 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1654.321 1195.863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27846 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27846 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 30936

Compare specifications (specs)