NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1530 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19413 vs 14190
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 759
• Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 113125 vs 68523
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 349.699 vs 171.616
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4484.349 vs 4031.404
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.702 vs 16.925
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1654.321 vs 1195.863
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27487 vs 13044
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27487 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 192.575
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3716
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3355
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3716
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19413 14190
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	942 759
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	113125 68523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	349.699 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4484.349 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.702 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	192.575 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1654.321 1195.863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27487 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27487 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 30936

Compare specifications (specs)