NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19612 vs 13932
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 815
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 117339 vs 69812
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 337.794 vs 171.616
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4566.815 vs 4031.404
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.631 vs 16.925
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1654.321 vs 1195.863
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 13044
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 13044
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19612 vs 13932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 vs 815 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 117339 vs 69812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 337.794 vs 171.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 vs 4031.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.631 vs 16.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1654.321 vs 1195.863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 13044 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 190.996
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3716
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3355
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3716
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 vs 190.996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19612 | 13932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 815 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 117339 | 69812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 337.794 | 171.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 | 4031.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.631 | 16.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.996 | 247.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1654.321 | 1195.863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 30936 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 23 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 109 | 118 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $999 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1200 MHz |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 496 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |