NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1530 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19601 vs 13276
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 812
• Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109268 vs 67192
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 356.363 vs 171.616
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4344.615 vs 4031.404
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.486 vs 16.925
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1653.943 vs 1195.863
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 29100 vs 13044
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 29100 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 193.37
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3710
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3356
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3710
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19601 13276
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	937 812
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	109268 67192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	356.363 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4344.615 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.486 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	193.37 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1653.943 1195.863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29100 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29100 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 30936

Compare specifications (specs)