NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and AMD Radeon Pro W5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 11065
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 11065
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 19 Nov 2019 |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 11065 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 86% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14707 vs 10117
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 904 vs 497
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69290 vs 57885
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14707 vs 10117 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 904 vs 497 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69290 vs 57885 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 14707 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 904 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 69290 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GA106 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 19 Nov 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 276 | 206 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1930 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | 8.893 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | 123.5 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | 277.9 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 205 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 10300 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |