NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 1077.3x more texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 76.86 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 3676
• 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 17696
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 vs 55.077
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2082.931 vs 830.773
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.561 vs 4.132
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 vs 82.584
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 599.217 vs 225.985
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 5431
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1123
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2678
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 5431
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1123
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2678

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

• Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 1035 MHz
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 497

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10117 3676
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	497 634
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57885 17696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	229.393 55.077
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2082.931 830.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.561 4.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.68 82.584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	599.217 225.985
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16098 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2678
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16098 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2678

Compare specifications (specs)