NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs AMD Radeon R7 M465
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and AMD Radeon R7 M465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 960 MHz
- 3066.7x more texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 27 GTexel / s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 2560 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 8.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 1159
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 vs 211
- 9.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 5841
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2535
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2535
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 15 May 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 960 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s vs 27 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 vs 1159 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 vs 211 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 vs 5841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2535 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M465
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M465
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon R7 M465 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 1159 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 211 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 5841 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 2535 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon R7 M465 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GA106 | Litho |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 276 | 1124 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | 960 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | 27 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |