NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
1422.7x more texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 2560 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 5029
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 vs 457
3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 17466
3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 vs 67.209
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2082.931 vs 799.414
3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.561 vs 4.536
4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 vs 30.523
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 599.217 vs 223.683
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 7043
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3685
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 7043
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3685
3.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 469 vs 122

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 May 2021 vs 25 October 2016
Texture fill rate	82.80 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2560 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 14 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	10117 vs 5029
PassMark - G2D Mark	497 vs 457
Geekbench - OpenCL	57885 vs 17466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	229.393 vs 67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2082.931 vs 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.561 vs 4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	134.68 vs 30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	599.217 vs 223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	16098 vs 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	16098 vs 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 3685
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	469 vs 122

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 735 MHz
Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1035 MHz
4.7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1290 MHz vs 735 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz vs 1035 MHz
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

10117

5029

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

497

457

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

57885

17466

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

229.393

67.209

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2082.931

799.414

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16.561

4.536

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

134.68

30.523

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

599.217

223.683

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16098

7043

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3360

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16098

7043

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3360

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

469

122

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark	10117	5029
PassMark - G2D Mark	497	457
Geekbench - OpenCL	57885	17466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	229.393	67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2082.931	799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.561	4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	134.68	30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	599.217	223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	16098	7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	16098	7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	469	122

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Pascal
Code name	GA106	GP107
Launch date	11 May 2021	25 October 2016
Place in performance rating	276	586
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$109
Price now		$124.99
Value for money (0-100)		56.95
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1035 MHz	1392 MHz
Core clock speed	735 MHz	1290 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	82.80 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.299 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.299 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	640
Pixel fill rate	49.68 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	82.80 GTexel/s	58.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	12000 million	3,300 million
CUDA cores		640
Floating-point performance		1,862 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		97 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Height		4.38" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		300 Watt
Width		2-slot
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	112 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective	7008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
GameStream
GPU Boost
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
ShadowWorks
VR Ready