NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 233.6x more texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 vs 205.837
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 vs 25.833
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 15019
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 15019
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 10 March 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 vs 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 vs 25.833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- 2x more core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- 2.8x more maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 4 GB
- 7.3x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 vs 10117
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 497
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67670 vs 57885
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2406.499 vs 2082.931
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 vs 16.561
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1002.573 vs 599.217
- 4.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2231 vs 469
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 vs 10117 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 497 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 vs 57885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 vs 2082.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 vs 16.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 vs 599.217 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2231 vs 469 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 18598 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 937 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 67670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 | 2231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA106 | GP102 |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 10 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 276 | 219 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |