NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 82.80 GTexel/s versus 354.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 16 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 versus 205.837
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 versus 25.833
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 versus 15019
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 versus 15019
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 versus 10 March 2017 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.80 GTexel/s versus 354.4 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 versus 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 versus 25.833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 versus 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 versus 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1481 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 53% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1035 MHz
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 2560
- 2.8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 11 GB versus 4 GB
- 7.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 11008 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 versus 10117
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 versus 497
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 67670 versus 57885
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2406.499 versus 2082.931
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 versus 16.561
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1002.573 versus 599.217
- 4.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2231 versus 469
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1481 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1035 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 versus 2560 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 11 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11008 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 versus 10117 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 versus 497 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 versus 57885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 versus 2082.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 versus 16.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 versus 599.217 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2231 versus 469 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 18598 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 937 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 67670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 | 2231 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA106 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 | 10 March 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 276 | 219 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Prix maintenant | $826.98 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1035 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.80 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 11,800 million |
Performance á point flottant | 11,340 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 91 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 11 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 352 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 11008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |