NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57386 vs 55409
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 200.776 vs 178.926
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.298 vs 11.167
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 108.443 vs 102.69
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 13569
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 13569
• Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5393 vs 4670

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1035 MHz
• Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 753 vs 497
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 802.026 vs 568.183

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10167 10144
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	497 753
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57386 55409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	200.776 178.926
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1938.08 1940.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.298 11.167
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	108.443 102.69
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	568.183 802.026
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16098 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16098 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	5393 4670

Compare specifications (specs)