NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 200.776
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 vs 1938.08
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 15.298
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 108.443
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 vs 568.183
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 vs 200.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 vs 1938.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 vs 15.298 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 108.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 vs 568.183 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10170 vs 9973
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 498 vs 476
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57389 vs 56978
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 12750
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 12750
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10170 vs 9973 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 vs 476 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57389 vs 56978 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9973 | 10170 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 498 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56978 | 57389 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 200.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 1938.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 15.298 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 108.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 568.183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5393 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Code name | GA106 | GA106 |
| Place in performance rating | 267 | 268 |
| Launch date | 11 May 2021 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 12000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Form factor | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500M
