NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 vs 2082.931
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 134.68
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 vs 599.217
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 vs 2082.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 134.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 vs 599.217 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10129 vs 9899
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 vs 486
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57800 vs 56580
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 vs 202.984
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 12750
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 12750
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10129 vs 9899 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 vs 486 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57800 vs 56580 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 vs 202.984 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 vs 16.498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9899 | 10129 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 486 | 497 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56580 | 57800 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 229.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 2082.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 16.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 134.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 599.217 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5443 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Code name | GA106 | GA106 |
| Place in performance rating | 283 | 264 |
| Launch date | 11 May 2021 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 12000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Form factor | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500M
