NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce MX450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.9x more pipelines: 2560 vs 896
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 3750
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 vs 307
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 28933
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2082.931 vs 849.116
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 6326
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 6326
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 1 Aug 2020 |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 896 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 vs 3750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 vs 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 vs 28933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 vs 849.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- 4.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2114 vs 469
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 vs 469 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 3750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 28933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | 849.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 | 2114 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 1 Aug 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 276 | 524 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 896 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | 100.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 64.03 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 10002 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |