NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce MX450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce MX450

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
2.9x more pipelines: 2560 vs 896
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 3750
Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 vs 307
2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 28933
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2082.931 vs 849.116
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 6326
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 6326

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 May 2021 vs 1 Aug 2020
Pipelines	2560 vs 896
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	10117 vs 3750
PassMark - G2D Mark	497 vs 307
Geekbench - OpenCL	57885 vs 28933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2082.931 vs 849.116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	16098 vs 6326
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	16098 vs 6326
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450

Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz
Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1035 MHz
Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
6.7x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
4.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2114 vs 469

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1395 MHz vs 735 MHz
Boost clock speed	1575 MHz vs 1035 MHz
Texture fill rate	100.8 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	10002 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2114 vs 469

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX450

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

10117

3750

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

497

307

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

57885

28933

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2082.931

849.116

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16098

6326

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3710

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3354

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16098

6326

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3710

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3354

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

469

2114

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce MX450
PassMark - G3D Mark	10117	3750
PassMark - G2D Mark	497	307
Geekbench - OpenCL	57885	28933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	229.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2082.931	849.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	134.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	599.217
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	16098	6326
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	16098	6326
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	469	2114

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce MX450
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Code name	GA106	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Launch date	11 May 2021	1 Aug 2020
Place in performance rating	276	524
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1035 MHz	1575 MHz
Core clock speed	735 MHz	1395 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	82.80 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.299 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.299 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	896
Pixel fill rate	49.68 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	82.80 GTexel/s	100.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	12000 million	4700 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.1
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	64.03 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective	10002 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5, GDDR6
Technologies
GPU Boost
Optimus