NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce MX450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • 2.9x more pipelines: 2560 vs 896
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 3750
  • Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 vs 307
  • 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 28933
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2082.931 vs 849.116
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 6326
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 6326
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 May 2021 vs 1 Aug 2020
Pipelines 2560 vs 896
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 10117 vs 3750
PassMark - G2D Mark 497 vs 307
Geekbench - OpenCL 57885 vs 28933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2082.931 vs 849.116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16098 vs 6326
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16098 vs 6326
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450

  • Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz
  • Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1035 MHz
  • Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
  • Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • 6.7x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
  • 4.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2114 vs 469
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz
Boost clock speed 1575 MHz vs 1035 MHz
Texture fill rate 100.8 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed 10002 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2114 vs 469

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX450

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
10117
3750
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
497
307
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
57885
28933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2082.931
849.116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16098
6326
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16098
6326
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
469
2114
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA GeForce MX450
PassMark - G3D Mark 10117 3750
PassMark - G2D Mark 497 307
Geekbench - OpenCL 57885 28933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 229.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2082.931 849.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 134.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 599.217
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16098 6326
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16098 6326
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 469 2114

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA GeForce MX450

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Turing
Code name GA106 N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Launch date 11 May 2021 1 Aug 2020
Place in performance rating 276 524
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1035 MHz 1575 MHz
Core clock speed 735 MHz 1395 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.299 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 896
Pixel fill rate 49.68 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 82.80 GTexel/s 100.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 12000 million 4700 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.1
OpenCL 3.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 64.03 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective 10002 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5, GDDR6

Technologies

GPU Boost
Optimus