NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 220 Watt
Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- 2x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2560
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 10117
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 497
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 57885
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 229.393
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 2082.931
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 16.561
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 134.68
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 599.217
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 16098
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3717
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3358
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 16098
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3717
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3358
- 6.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 469
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 317.4 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 10117 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 vs 497 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 57885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 229.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 2082.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 vs 16.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 vs 134.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 vs 599.217 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 16098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 16098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 vs 469 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 22253 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 123479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | 453.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | 182.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 | 3163 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA106 | GA104 |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 276 | 44 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 220 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |