NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

  • La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
  • 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 220 Watt
Date de sortie 11 May 2021 versus 1 Sep 2020
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt versus 220 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

  • 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 735 MHz
  • Environ 67% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1035 MHz
  • times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 317.4 GTexel/s versus 82.80 GTexel/s
  • 2.3x plus de pipelines: 5888 versus 2560
  • 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
  • Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
  • 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 versus 10117
  • 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 497
  • 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 57885
  • Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 229.393
  • 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 2082.931
  • 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 16.561
  • Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 versus 134.68
  • 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 versus 599.217
  • Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 16098
  • 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3717
  • 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3358
  • Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 16098
  • 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3717
  • 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3358
  • 6.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 469
Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau 1500 MHz versus 735 MHz
Vitesse augmenté 1725 MHz versus 1035 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture 317.4 GTexel/s versus 82.80 GTexel/s
Pipelines 5888 versus 2560
Taille de mémore maximale 8 GB versus 4 GB
Vitesse de mémoire 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark 22253 versus 10117
PassMark - G2D Mark 999 versus 497
Geekbench - OpenCL 123479 versus 57885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 453.922 versus 229.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 5803.174 versus 2082.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 40.757 versus 16.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 182.055 versus 134.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1664.554 versus 599.217
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 31716 versus 16098
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 13566 versus 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 31930 versus 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 31716 versus 16098
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 13566 versus 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 31930 versus 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3163 versus 469

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
10117
22253
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
497
999
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
57885
123479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
229.393
453.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2082.931
5803.174
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16.561
40.757
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
134.68
182.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
599.217
1664.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16098
31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
31930
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16098
31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
31930
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
469
3163
Nom NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark 10117 22253
PassMark - G2D Mark 497 999
Geekbench - OpenCL 57885 123479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 229.393 453.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2082.931 5803.174
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.561 40.757
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 134.68 182.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 599.217 1664.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16098 31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 31930
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16098 31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 31930
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 469 3163

Comparer les caractéristiques

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Essentiel

Architecture Ampere Ampere
Nom de code GA106 GA104
Date de sortie 11 May 2021 1 Sep 2020
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 276 44
Genre Laptop Desktop
Prix de sortie (MSRP) $499

Infos techniques

Vitesse augmenté 1035 MHz 1725 MHz
Vitesse du noyau 735 MHz 1500 MHz
Processus de fabrication 8 nm 8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.299 TFLOPS 20.31 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 5888
Pixel fill rate 49.68 GPixel/s 165.6 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture 82.80 GTexel/s 317.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 220 Watt
Compte de transistor 12000 million 17400 million

Sorties et ports de vidéo

Connecteurs d’écran Portable Device Dependent 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences

Facteur de forme IGP Dual-slot
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires None 1x 12-pin
Hauteur 112 mm (4.4 inches)
Longeur 242 mm, 9.5 inches
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) 550 Watt
Largeur 112 mm, 4.4 inches

Soutien API

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7 6.7
Vulkan

Mémoire

RAM maximale 4 GB 8 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire 192.0 GB/s 448.0 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire 128 bit 256 bit
Vitesse de mémoire 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Genre de mémoire GDDR6 GDDR6