NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 220 Watt
Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 220 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 67% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1035 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 317.4 GTexel/s versus 82.80 GTexel/s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 5888 versus 2560
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 versus 10117
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 497
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 57885
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 229.393
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 2082.931
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 16.561
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 versus 134.68
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 versus 599.217
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 16098
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3717
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3358
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 16098
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3717
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3358
- 6.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 469
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1035 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s versus 82.80 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5888 versus 2560 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 versus 10117 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 versus 497 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 versus 57885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 versus 229.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 versus 2082.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 versus 16.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 versus 134.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 versus 599.217 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 16098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 16098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 versus 469 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 22253 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 123479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | 453.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | 182.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 | 3163 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA106 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 276 | 44 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1035 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.80 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 220 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 12-pin |
Hauteur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |