NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher pipelines: 4864 vs 3840
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 998 vs 973
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 16162
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 16162
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 3840 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 998 vs 973 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 16162 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 505.2 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22309 vs 20566
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 126068 vs 107393
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 432.118 vs 313.695
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.585 vs 35.994
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 vs 137.972
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 vs 1474.189
- Around 40% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 16322 vs 11644
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 505.2 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22309 vs 20566 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 126068 vs 107393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 vs 313.695 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 vs 35.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 vs 137.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 vs 1474.189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 vs 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 16322 vs 11644 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 6800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20566 | 22309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 998 | 973 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107393 | 126068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 313.695 | 432.118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4580.983 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.994 | 41.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 137.972 | 383.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 2280.457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3373 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11644 | 16322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | GA104 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $579 |
Place in performance rating | 100 | 77 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 2105 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4864 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 26800 million |
Compute units | 60 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |