NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- 3787.8x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- 6.3x more pipelines: 4864 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7 GB/s
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 6332
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 650
- 5.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 20732
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 75.758
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 843.503
- 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 5.071
- 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 24.676
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 301.168
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 8496
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3687
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3336
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 8496
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3687
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3336
- 8.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 305
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 25 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 305 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 200 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA104 | GP107 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 25 October 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $139 |
Place in performance rating | 104 | 487 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 145 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 7 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |