NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1392 MHz
  • Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1392 MHz
  • 3787.8x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
  • 6.3x more pipelines: 4864 vs 768
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7 GB/s
  • 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 6332
  • Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 650
  • 5.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 20732
  • 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 75.758
  • 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 843.503
  • 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 5.071
  • 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 24.676
  • 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 301.168
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 8496
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3687
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3336
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 8496
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3687
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3336
  • 8.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 305
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 Dec 2020 vs 25 October 2016
Core clock speed 1410 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Boost clock speed 1665 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Texture fill rate 253.1 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
Pipelines 4864 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 14 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 20394 vs 6332
PassMark - G2D Mark 989 vs 650
Geekbench - OpenCL 109075 vs 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 323.141 vs 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4756.579 vs 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 35.311 vs 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 150.943 vs 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1474.189 vs 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 27478 vs 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 vs 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 27478 vs 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 vs 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2671 vs 305

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

  • 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 200 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 200 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
20394
6332
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
989
650
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
109075
20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
323.141
75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4756.579
843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
35.311
5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
150.943
24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1474.189
301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27478
8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27478
8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
2671
305
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark 20394 6332
PassMark - G2D Mark 989 650
Geekbench - OpenCL 109075 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 323.141 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4756.579 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 35.311 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 150.943 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1474.189 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 27478 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 27478 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2671 305

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Pascal
Code name GA104 GP107
Launch date 1 Dec 2020 25 October 2016
Launch price (MSRP) $399 $139
Place in performance rating 104 487
Type Desktop Desktop
Price now $159.99
Value for money (0-100) 46.07

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1665 MHz 1392 MHz
Core clock speed 1410 MHz 1392 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 16.20 TFLOPS
Pipelines 4864 768
Pixel fill rate 133.2 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 253.1 GTexel/s 66.82 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 200 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 17400 million 3,300 million
CUDA cores 768
Floating-point performance 2,138 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Dual-slot
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 242 mm (9.5 inches) 145 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 12-pin None
Width 112 mm (4.4 inches)

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 112 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) 7 GB/s
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready