NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s
• 3.8x more pipelines: 4864 vs 1280
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 10180
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 751
• Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 55838
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 178.014
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 1961.932
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 11.169
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 109.29
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 787.025
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 13569
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 13569
• 7.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 352

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1410 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 200 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	20394 10180
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	989 751
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	109075 55838
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	323.141 178.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4756.579 1961.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.311 11.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	150.943 109.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1474.189 787.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2671 352

Compare specifications (specs)