NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
Environ 83% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 138.0 GTexel/s
3.8x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 1280
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 10180
Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 751
Environ 95% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 55838
Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 178.014
2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 1961.932
3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 11.169
Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 109.29
Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 787.025
2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 13569
2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 13569
7.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 352

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	1 Dec 2020 versus 22 Nov 2019
Taux de remplissage de la texture	253.1 GTexel/s versus 138.0 GTexel/s
Pipelines	4864 versus 1280
Processus de fabrication	8 nm versus 12 nm
Taille de mémore maximale	8 GB versus 4 GB
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	20394 versus 10180
PassMark - G2D Mark	989 versus 751
Geekbench - OpenCL	109075 versus 55838
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	323.141 versus 178.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	4756.579 versus 1961.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	35.311 versus 11.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	150.943 versus 109.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1474.189 versus 787.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	27478 versus 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 versus 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 versus 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	27478 versus 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 versus 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 versus 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2671 versus 352

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1410 MHz
Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1665 MHz
2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 200 Watt

Vitesse du noyau	1530 MHz versus 1410 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1725 MHz versus 1665 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt versus 200 Watt

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

20394

10180

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

989

751

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

109075

55838

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

323.141

178.014

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4756.579

1961.932

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

35.311

11.169

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

150.943

109.29

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1474.189

787.025

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27478

13569

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27478

13569

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3357

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

2671

352

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark	20394	10180
PassMark - G2D Mark	989	751
Geekbench - OpenCL	109075	55838
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	323.141	178.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	4756.579	1961.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	35.311	11.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	150.943	109.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1474.189	787.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	27478	13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	27478	13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2671	352

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Essentiel
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Nom de code	GA104	TU116
Date de sortie	1 Dec 2020	22 Nov 2019
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$399
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	104	283
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1665 MHz	1725 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1410 MHz	1530 MHz
Processus de fabrication	8 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	253.1 GFLOPS (1:64)	138.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	16.20 TFLOPS (1:1)	8.832 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	16.20 TFLOPS	4.416 TFLOPS
Pipelines	4864	1280
Pixel fill rate	133.2 GPixel/s	55.20 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	253.1 GTexel/s	138.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	200 Watt	100 Watt
Compte de transistor	17400 million	6600 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort
HDMI
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Facteur de forme	Dual-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	242 mm (9.5 inches)	9 inches (229 mm)
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	350 Watt	350 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 12-pin	1x 6-pin
Largeur	112 mm (4.4 inches)	Dual-slot
Soutien API
DirectX	12.2	12.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	8 GB	4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	448 GB/s	192 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 bit	128 bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6	GDDR6