NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 90% higher pipelines: 4864 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20500 vs 18226
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 990 vs 881
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 108986 vs 99350
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 293.508
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4829.953 vs 4045.784
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 29.145
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1477.456 vs 1438.826
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 25232
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 25232
- 1668.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11682 vs 7
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 2 July 2019 |
| Pipelines | 4864 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 215 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20500 vs 18226 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 990 vs 881 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 108986 vs 99350 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 293.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4829.953 vs 4045.784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 29.145 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 vs 1438.826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 25232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 25232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11682 vs 7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 vs 150.943
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 vs 150.943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20500 | 18226 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 990 | 881 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 108986 | 99350 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 293.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4829.953 | 4045.784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 29.145 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 158.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | 1438.826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 25232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 25232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11682 | 7 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA104 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 2 July 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $499 |
| Place in performance rating | 99 | 141 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1605 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4864 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 13.6 B |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 650 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2-Slot |
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIARTX A6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAA30
