NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 90% de pipelines plus haut: 4864 versus 2560
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 8% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 215 Watt
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20500 versus 18226
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 990 versus 881
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 108986 versus 99350
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 293.508
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4829.953 versus 4045.784
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 29.145
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1477.456 versus 1438.826
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 25232
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 25232
- 1668.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11682 versus 7
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 2 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 2560 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20500 versus 18226 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 990 versus 881 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 108986 versus 99350 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4829.953 versus 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 versus 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11682 versus 7 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 versus 150.943
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 versus 150.943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3717 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20500 | 18226 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 990 | 881 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 108986 | 99350 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4829.953 | 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11682 | 7 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 2 July 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 99 | 141 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 13.6 B |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 650 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2-Slot |
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |