NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 954 MHz
• 17451.7x more texture fill rate: 532.8 GTexel/s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
• 26.7x more pipelines: 10240 vs 384
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
• 6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
• 17.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26935 vs 1578
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 vs 385
• 51.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 4071
• 33.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 485.179 vs 14.332
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 661.977 vs 265.424
• 55.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.472 vs 1.093
• 8.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 129.036 vs 15.009
• 63.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.001 vs 38.219
• 14.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 vs 2446
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1631
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1974
• 14.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 vs 2446
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1631
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1974

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000

• 6.9x lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 3.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	26935 1578
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1088 385
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	209081 4071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	485.179 14.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	661.977 265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60.472 1.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	129.036 15.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2441.001 38.219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34770 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34770 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 1974

Compare specifications (specs)