NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 71% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 206.2x more texture fill rate: 465.1 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- Around 6% higher pipelines: 8704 vs 2x 4096
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 320 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25146 vs 8299
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 vs 787
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 167014 vs 55512
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 vs 141.474
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 vs 3621.344
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 vs 13.132
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 112.973
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 vs 799.933
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 10141
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 10141
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 26 April 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 465.1 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 8704 vs 2x 4096 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 vs 8299 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 vs 787 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 vs 55512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 vs 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 vs 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 vs 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 vs 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3356
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3356
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 | 8299 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 787 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 | 55512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 38251 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4420 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GA102 | Capsaicin |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 26 April 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 56 | 192 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Design | reference | |
Price now | $849 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8704 | 2x 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 164.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 465.1 GTexel/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 277 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 3x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | DirectX® 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 760.3 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |