NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1365 MHz
• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1680 MHz
• 5.5x more pipelines: 10496 vs 1920
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 vs 14119
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 746
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 71402
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 vs 217.04
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 3119.736
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 vs 21.707
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 vs 133.975
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1141.283
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 20094
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 20094
• 4.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5118 vs 1242

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 11.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3713
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3354
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3713
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3354

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	26668 14119
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1060 746
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	191142 71402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	690.619 217.04
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7585.258 3119.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	62.614 21.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	209.424 133.975
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2441.384 1141.283
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 6714
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 6714
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	5118 1242

Compare specifications (specs)