NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1395 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1695 MHz versus 1680 MHz
- 5.5x plus de pipelines: 10496 versus 1920
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26815 versus 14149
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 versus 750
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 188320 versus 70668
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 versus 220.337
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 versus 3131.344
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 versus 21.852
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 versus 135.923
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 versus 1141.283
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 versus 20094
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 versus 20094
- 2.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19877 versus 7489
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 7 January 2019 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz versus 1680 MHz |
Pipelines | 10496 versus 1920 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26815 versus 14149 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 versus 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 versus 70668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 versus 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 versus 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 versus 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 versus 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 versus 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 versus 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 versus 20094 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19877 versus 7489 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 11.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3713
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3354
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3713
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3354
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3354 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26815 | 14149 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 | 70668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19877 | 7489 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA102 | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 7 January 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1499 | $349 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 40 | 150 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10496 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 229 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | Triple-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 24 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 936.2 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |