NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1440 MHz
4.6x more pipelines: 10496 vs 2304
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26815 vs 12354
Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 601
Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 18604
Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 18604
2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19877 vs 7453

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 Sep 2020 vs 29 January 2019
Core clock speed	1395 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Boost clock speed	1695 MHz vs 1440 MHz
Pipelines	10496 vs 2304
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	26815 vs 12354
PassMark - G2D Mark	1051 vs 601
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	33398 vs 18604
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	33398 vs 18604
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	19877 vs 7453

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

3x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 350 Watt
11.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3713
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3354
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3713
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3354

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	115 Watt vs 350 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8898 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8029 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8898 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8029 vs 3354

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

26815

12354

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1051

601

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33398

18604

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3713

8898

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

8029

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33398

18604

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3713

8898

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

8029

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

19877

7453

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark	26815	12354
PassMark - G2D Mark	1051	601
Geekbench - OpenCL	188320
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	732.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	7585.258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	63.011
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	247.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2441.384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	33398	18604
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3713	8898
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	8029
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	33398	18604
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3713	8898
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	8029
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	19877	7453

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Code name	GA102	TU106
Launch date	1 Sep 2020	29 January 2019
Launch price (MSRP)	$1499
Place in performance rating	40	128
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Price now		$489.99
Value for money (0-100)		49.06
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1695 MHz	1440 MHz
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	1215 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	35.58 TFLOPS
Pipelines	10496	2304
Pixel fill rate	189.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	556.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	350 Watt	115 Watt
Transistor count	28300 million	10,800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	138 mm (5.4 inches)
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	313 mm (12.3 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU)	750 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin
Width	Triple-slot
API support
DirectX	12.2	12.0
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB
Memory bandwidth	936.2 GB/s
Memory bus width	384 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6