NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1545 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26815 vs 21785
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 935
• Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 188320 vs 138583
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 394.035
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 5461.22
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 41.133
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 173.697
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1987.605
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 23659
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 23659
• Around 36% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19877 vs 14606

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 11.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	26815 21785
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1051 935
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	188320 138583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	732.196 394.035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7585.258 5461.22
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	63.011 41.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	247.569 173.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2441.384 1987.605
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 23659
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 23659
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	19877 14606

Compare specifications (specs)