NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1395 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1695 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26818 versus 21784
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 versus 935
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 188320 versus 138583
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 versus 394.035
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 versus 5461.22
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 versus 41.133
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 versus 173.697
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 versus 1987.605
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 versus 23659
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 versus 23659
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19875 versus 14612
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26818 versus 21784 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 versus 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 versus 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 versus 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 versus 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 versus 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 versus 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 versus 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 versus 23659 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19875 versus 14612 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 11.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3354 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26818 | 21784 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 | 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19875 | 14612 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA102 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1499 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 40 | 83 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10496 | |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | Triple-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 24 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 936.2 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X |