NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Tesla M10

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Tesla M10 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1306 MHz
• 1229.4x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec
• 4.1x more pipelines: 10496 vs 4x 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
• 8.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 vs 3046
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 385
• 18.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 10282
• 15x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 vs 46.191
• 9.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 814.192
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 vs 50.918
• 13.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 180.026
• 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 5204
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3693
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3306
• 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 5204
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3693
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3306

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M10

• Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4x 8 GB vs 24 GB
• 4.3x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M10

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	26668 3046
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1060 385
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	191142 10282
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	690.619 46.191
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7585.258 814.192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	209.424 50.918
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2441.384 180.026
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 5204
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 5204
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3306

Compare specifications (specs)