NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 versus NVIDIA Tesla M10
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Tesla M10 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1395 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1695 MHz versus 1306 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 556.0 GTexel/s versus 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec
- 4.1x plus de pipelines: 10496 versus 4x 640
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
- 8.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 versus 3046
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 versus 385
- 18.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 versus 10282
- 15x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 versus 46.191
- 9.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 versus 814.192
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 versus 50.918
- 13.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 versus 180.026
- 6.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 versus 5204
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 versus 3693
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 versus 3306
- 6.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 versus 5204
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 versus 3693
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 versus 3306
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 18 May 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz versus 1306 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s versus 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 10496 versus 4x 640 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 versus 3046 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 versus 385 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 versus 10282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 versus 46.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 versus 814.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 versus 50.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 versus 180.026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 versus 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 versus 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 3306 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M10
- Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4x 8 GB versus 24 GB
- 4.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5200 MHz versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4x 8 GB versus 24 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M10
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Tesla M10 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 | 3046 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 385 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 | 10282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 | 46.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 814.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 | 50.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 180.026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3306 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Tesla M10 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
Nom de code | GA102 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 18 May 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 46 | 626 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1306 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10496 | 4x 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 1,870 million |
Performance á point flottant | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | Triple-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 24 GB | 4x 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 936.2 GB/s | 4x 83.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 4x 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 5200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |