NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM versus AMD Radeon RX 5700
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and AMD Radeon RX 5700 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1465 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1755 MHz versus 1725 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 126.4 GTexel/s versus 248.4 GT/s
- Environ 38% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 130 Watt versus 180 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 965 versus 888
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 4 Jan 2022 versus 7 July 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1465 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1755 MHz versus 1725 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 126.4 GTexel/s versus 248.4 GT/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 965 versus 888 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14500 versus 12051
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 66240 versus 60930
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8499 versus 6242
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 versus 207.741
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 versus 2522.737
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 versus 19.08
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 87.152
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 versus 806.848
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14500 versus 12051 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66240 versus 60930 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 versus 6242 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 versus 207.741 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 versus 2522.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 versus 19.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 87.152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 versus 806.848 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | AMD Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 965 | 888 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12051 | 14500 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 60930 | 66240 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6242 | 8499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.741 | 209.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2522.737 | 3686.851 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.08 | 21.941 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.152 | 250 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 | 1036.448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA |
| Nom de code | GA106 | Navi 10 |
| Date de sortie | 4 Jan 2022 | 7 July 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 181 | 177 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1755 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz | 1465 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | 15.9 TFLOPs |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | 7.95 TFLOPs |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | 110.4 GP/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 126.4 GTexel/s | 248.4 GT/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 10.3 B |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
| Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
