NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM versus AMD Radeon RX 5700
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and AMD Radeon RX 5700 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1465 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1755 MHz versus 1725 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 126.4 GTexel/s versus 248.4 GT/s
- Environ 38% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 130 Watt versus 180 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 964 versus 881
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 Jan 2022 versus 7 July 2019 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1465 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1755 MHz versus 1725 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 126.4 GTexel/s versus 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 964 versus 881 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14403 versus 11933
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 66014 versus 60565
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8497 versus 6262
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 versus 207.741
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 versus 2525.787
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 versus 19.08
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 87.152
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 versus 806.848
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14403 versus 11933 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66014 versus 60565 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8497 versus 6262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 versus 207.741 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 versus 2525.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 versus 19.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 87.152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 versus 806.848 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | AMD Radeon RX 5700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 964 | 881 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11933 | 14403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60565 | 66014 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6262 | 8497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.741 | 209.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2525.787 | 3686.851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.08 | 21.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.152 | 250 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 | 1036.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA |
Nom de code | GA106 | Navi 10 |
Date de sortie | 4 Jan 2022 | 7 July 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 191 | 193 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1755 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz | 1465 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | 15.9 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | 7.95 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | 110.4 GP/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 126.4 GTexel/s | 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 10.3 B |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | 600 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |