NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 215 Watt
- 1175x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8225 vs 7
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 2 July 2019 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 215 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8225 vs 7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1755 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 880 vs 626
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18233 vs 14436
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99408 vs 73914
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1755 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 880 vs 626 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18233 vs 14436 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99408 vs 73914 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 880 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14436 | 18233 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 73914 | 99408 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8225 | 7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Code name | AD107 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 2 July 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 138 | 141 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1605 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 215 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Transistor count | 13.6 B | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6 pin + 8 pin |
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Width | 2-Slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 96 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
